FCLA Users Group Meeting 1988
A. Circulation Implementation Operational: UF, USF, UNF, FSU-Law, UWF Operational by 7/1/88: FIU (next week), FAU Operational by fall, 88: FAMU Planned for end of 88/early 89: FSU, UCF
B. MFHL Phase 1: loading of LAMBDA display data is end development; projected completion data June. Phase 2: loading MARC records awaiting update on NOTIS' development schedule. VITLS has displaced it in the NOTIS priorities. Phase 3: Display of LUIS data from MARC data: waiting NOTIS development
C. LUIS Menu Now operational at all terminals Remote/Dial-in: enter LUIS rather then an LU transaction; enter database choice, can enter MENU from any screen Autologon: enter MENU from any screen; doesn't timeout; should we disallow MENU from autologged terminals?
D. NOTIS 4.5
Course Reserve, Bill and Fine Records, NOFA fixes, VITLS, Keyword/Boolean,
New Tag Table (update #15)
E. Keyword/Boolean
FCLA has been testing the currently released version which has proved to be
somewhat costly to operate. NOTIS 4.5 will have a vastly improved
version which we will test in the summer and fall. The current
FCLA EDP budget will not cover cost of K/B; will just barely cover
the costs of LUIS now
(March hit peak 8.6 million transactions @ average 1.3/transaction or $111,00).
1987/88 costs for CICS are approximately $1,000,000. Storage costs
are running $500,000 and are increasing. Other EDP expenses are
about $500,000 also.
F. FCLA Adaptations to NOTIS
Tag tables -- reflect OCLC data and more current than NOTIS
Messages/LUIS screens/FUND record (acq.) screen
Institution name on LUIS screens
Load software/ONI
Table management
G. Five-Year Plan
1. Continue NOTIS
2. Continue RLG
3. Keyword/Boolean
4. Union index (will begin in 88/89)
5. Alternate cataloging
6. Cross-database circulation
7. Linking to other systems
8. Document delivery
9. Mounting reference databases (ERIC)
The plan was organized to level the budget increase being requested across the
five years from 89/90 - 93/94.
H. PEPC Study
The Post Secondary Education Planning Commission was ordered by the
legislature to study FCLA's mission and recommend what its
objectives should be. The commission of lay-people conducted
surveys, held hearings, hired independent consultants, and
interviewed most of the relevant players in the state. Their report
recommends, essentially, that FCLA concentrate on automating the
libraries within the SUS.
ACTION NOTES from 1988 JOINT MEETING